Suffolk University is a teaching and research institution committed to promoting the ethical conduct of human subjects research in accordance with the guiding principles outlined in the Belmont Report, the Nuremberg Code and federal regulations codified in the 45 CFR 46 Common Rule under the auspices of the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Suffolk University holds a Federal-wide Assurance (FWA) with the Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP) that articulates the institution’s commitment to complying with government, state and local policies governing human subject research.
All research involving human participants conducted under the auspices of Suffolk University requires the independent and prospective review and approval by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). No matter how seemingly benign, the proposed research project must be reviewed by the IRB before relevant work commences. Commencing human subject research before or without IRB approval constitutes non-compliance and may have serious implications for an investigator.
The IRB is available to consult with faculty, staff, or students in the early stages of project development regarding the review process and categories of review.
The IRB is a committee comprised of faculty, staff, and non-affiliated members who are charged with reviewing all human subjects research conducted by Suffolk University faculty, staff and students in accordance with current HHS and FDA regulations and guidelines. The mission of the IRB is to ensure the ethical conduct of human subject research by protecting the rights and welfare of human subjects who take part in such research. In its review of proposed research activities involving human subjects the IRB ensures:
Risks to subjects are minimized
The IRB evaluates whether procedures performed on subjects are consistent with sound research design and do not unnecessarily expose subjects to risk.
Risks to subjects are reasonable
Risks are reasonable in relation to any benefits that might be expected from taking part in a research study and to the importance of the knowledge that may result.
Selection of subjects is fair and equitable
The IRB seeks to determine that no eligible individuals are denied the opportunity to take part in any study, particularly those from which they may benefit, based on an arbitrary criterion such as gender, age or language barriers.
Participation of subjects is voluntary
Planned recruitment and consent procedures will result in voluntary participation and that informed consent will be obtained from each prospective subject or where appropriate, from the subject's legally authorized representative.
Data Safety Monitoring
The research plan provides for monitoring the data collected to ensure the safety of subjects.
Protection of Privacy
There are adequate provisions to protect the privacy of subjects and to maintain the confidentiality of data collected on research participants.
Through the review process and post-approval monitoring the IRB evaluates the integrity of the informed consent process as well as procedures that safeguard the confidentiality of personally identifiable information associated with the collection of data on research participants.